The article that hector wrote about convicts getting H1N1 shots brought up some good points, but on the whole I disagree with the article.

Firstly, pregnant women need the vaccination, period. If they happen to be incarcerated makes no difference, but to say that all convicts get preference because there are many pregnant women inmates would be wrong. The elderly, pregnant women, and children need the vaccine first without a doubt.

Another point I discovered was hinted at, but never reached it's destination. Convicts cannot just go out and receive the shot if they so choose. Yes I feel this is a valid point. But if that was to justify giving preferential allotments to inmates it would prevent citizens who have chosen to respectfully regard the laws from doing the same. If there is such a limited amount to be given you cannot prevent an un-incarcirated individual from receiving the shot by giving it to someone who is in jail. You just don't punish the innocent for the gain of the guilty.

Which brings another point to mind. I do believe it is unsafe for prison guards and prisoners who will be released to not be vaccinated, of course. Thus reducing the risk for people associated with the prison system as well as the rest of society who comes in contact with them.

Basically, I understand the view of the article but couldn't disagree more, respectfully. The statements made do ask a good question but do not find the right answer. Prisoners should not be denied the shot all together . But rather receive rationing for the average number of at risk individuals, those that work in the prison system and those being released. But if a healthy rapist gets the sot before a 6 month pregnant women who still hasn't received hers, tat would be wholy unjustified, unsafe, and unconscious of the rights and privileges that morality and law abiding earns you.